Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artículos

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)

Design and Implementation of a Blended Learning Educational Intervention for Teaching Microbiology in the Licentiate Degree in Nutrition

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30972/conf.19476
Submitted
July 1, 2026
Published
2026-07-01

Abstract

Teaching microbiology in health sciences programs presents challenges related to the development of specific technical skills and limitations in infrastructure and teaching resources. This study describes the design, implementation, and analysis of a blended learning educational intervention in the Introduction to Microbiology and Parasitology course within the Nutrition degree program at the Faculty of Medical Sciences (FCM), National University of Córdoba (UNC), during the 2024 academic year. A descriptive, cross- sectional study was conducted. The study population consisted of 188 students who completed the course. The teaching sequence combined preparatory online components (instructional videos, interactive simulators, self-assessment activities, and a discussion forum) with in-person laboratory sessions. Student perceptions were assessed using a structured survey.

The survey was completed by 73 students (38.8% of those who participated). Among respondents, 97.3% rated the material available in the virtual classroom to be very or quite useful in supporting in-person sessions. Additionally, 67.1% of students correctly performed the plate inoculation technique according to criteria established in a structured teacher checklist. Approximately 30% reduction in the time spent on the initial laboratory instruction was observed. The findings suggest that the virtual environment functioned as an anticipatory tool that facilitated prior preparation and optimized in-person time, representing a viable pedagogical strategy in contexts of high enrollment and limited resources.

References

  1. Barradas-Arenas, U., Cocón-Juárez, J., Pérez- Cruz, D. & Vázquez-Aragón, M. del R. (2023). El Impacto de los Simuladores en el Aprendizaje de los Sistemas Digitales. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 16(1), 67-76 https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v16i1.350
  2. Cabero-Alemanra, J., & Marín Díaz, V. (2018). Blended learning y realidad aumentada: experiencias de diseño docente. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18719
  3. Conti, J. P., Ruiz, M. J., Martínez Cuesta, L., & Juliarena, M. A. (2021). Laboratorio microbiológico virtual: ¿nuevas herramientas para la enseñanza presencial? Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/170539
  4. Contreras-Gelves, G.A., Carreño-Moreno, P. (2012). Simuladores en el ámbito educativo un recurso didáctico para la enseñanza. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería; 13(25), 107-117. https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Ingenium/article/view/1313
  5. Cook, D.A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., Erwin, P. J., & Hamstra, S. J. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234
  6. Gisbert-Cervera, M., de Benito-Crosetti, B., Pérez-Garcies, A., Salinas-Ibáñez, J. (2018). Blended Learning, más allá de la clase presencial. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), pp. 195-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18859
  7. Herrero, M. L., Serrano, M. E., Saguez, V., Simón, M., & Chirino, A. (2021). Experiencia con simulador. Una actividad complementaria en la enseñanza de la física. Revista de enseñanza de la física; 33, 343-348. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF/article/view/35582/35717
  8. Lateef F. (2010). Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock, 3(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.70743
  9. Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding Immersive Virtual Reality to a Science Lab Simulation Causes More Presence but Less Learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
  10. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Medical education, 44(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
  11. Michigan State University (2021).Virtual interactive bacteriology laboratory. https://learn.chm.msu.edu/vibl/
  12. Miller, AV., Marks, T., & Thompson, D. K. (2025). Student performance and perceptions in a hybrid laboratory model: an exploratory study of interactive virtual simulations and in-person integration in a foundational microbiology course. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 26(1), e0020324. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00203-24
  13. Wang, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, J., Zhou, Q., Hu, H., Chen Y., & Jiang J. (2025) Application of virtual simulations in the practical teaching of clinical microbiology laboratory courses. BMC Medical Education, 25, 1024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07603-y