Practical and Theoretical implications of perch use for avian predators on rodent populations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30972/eco.16277072Resumen
We hypothesized that the vertical structure of the habitat is a determining feature of avian predation intensity on rodents, other habitat conditions being equal.
Two trap grids for rodents were set up in a field with com stubble at two times, before and after setting up perches in the experimental plot; one of the trap grids served as a control. There was no significant difference in captures between control and experimental grids before setting up perches (control validation). However, more rodents were captured in the control than in the experimental plot after the treatment. Predation lowered rodent density by roughly 40%. Calomys laucha was the affected species. Differential predation was not observed according to size or sex. We conclude that habitat vertical structure causes significant changes in rodent abundance, and it should be considered in rodent control and raptor management.
Citas
ANDERSSON, M. & ERLINGE, S. 1977. Influence of predation on rodent populations. Oikos, 29: 591-597.
BEACHMAN, T. D. 1979: Selectivity of avian predation in declining populations of the volé Microtus townsendii. Can. J. Zool., 57: 1767-1772.
BELLOCQ, M. 1.1988: Predaci ón de roedores por aves en ecosistemas agrarios, Ph. D. thesis: Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
BIRNEY, B. C.; GRANT, W. E. & BAIRD, D. D. 1976. Importance of vegetative cover to cycles of Microtus populations. Ecology, 57: 1043-1051.
CHARNOV, E. L. & ORIANS, G. H. 1973. Optimal foraging: some theoretical explorations. Unpublished manuscript.
CRESPO, J. A. 1966. Ecología de una comunidad de roedores silvestres en el partido de Rojas provincia de Buenos Aires. Rev. Mus. Ciencias Nat. Ecol. 1: 79-134.
DE VILLAFANE, G.; BONAVENTURA, S. M.; BELLOCQ, M. I. & PERCICH, R. E. 1988. Habitat selection, social structure, density, and predation in populations of Cricetine rodents in the pampa región of Argentina and the effects of agricultural practices on them. Mammalia, 52: 339-359.
ERLINGE, S. et al., 1983. Predation as a regulating factor on small rodent populations in Southern Sweden. Oikos, 40: 36-52.
ERRINGTON, P. L. 1946. Predation and vertébrate populations. Quart. Rev. Biol. 21:144-177.
GREEN, C. H. 1986. Pattems of prey selection: implications of predators foraging tactics. Am. Nat., 128: 824-839.
GREEN, M. C. & TAYLOR, F. F. 1975. Preliminary experiments in habitats alterations as a means of controlling field rodents in Kenya. [In Biocontrol of rodents, Ecol. Bull. 19 NFR. 175-184],
KORPIMAKI, E. & NORRDAHL, K. 1989. Predation of Tengmalm’s owls: numerical responses, functional responses and dapening impact on population fluctuations of microtines. Oikos, 54: 154-164.
KRAVETZ, F. O.; MANJON, M. C.; BUSCH, M.; PERCICH, R. E.; MARCONI, P. N. & TORRES, M. P. 1981. Ecologia de Calomys laucha (Rodentia, Cricetidae) en el departamento de Rio Cuarto (Córdoba). I. Dinámica de población. Ecologia, 6: 15-22.
KOTLER, B. 1984. Harvesting rates and predatory risk in desert rodents: a comparison of two communities on different continents. J. Mamm., 65: 91-96.
MORRIS, L. F.; CHESHIRE, W. F.; MILLER, C. A. & MOTT, D. G. 1958. The numerical response of avian and mammalian predators during a gradation of the spruce budworm. Ecology, 39:487-494.
PEARSON, O. P. 1966. The prey of camivore^ during one cycle of mouse abundance. J. An. Ecol. 35r 217-233.
— 1985. Predation. Special Publication, Am. Soc. of Mammalogists, 8: 535-566.
RYSZKOWSKI, L.; GOSZCZYNSKI, J. & TRUSZKOWSKI, J. 1971. Operational of predators in a forest and cultivated ñelds. Ann. Zool. Fennica, 8: 160-169.
TAITT, M. J. & KREBS, C. J. 1983. Predation, cover and food manipularon during a spring decline of Microtus townsendii. J. An. Ecol., 52: 837-848.
Descargas
Publicado
Versiones
- 2023-12-01 (3)
- 2023-11-29 (2)
- 2023-11-29 (1)
