Assessment of historical Andreaea names from northwestern Argentina clarifies the taxonomy of ecostate Andreaea species in the Central Andes

Autores

  • Guillermo M. Suárez Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e IML, Miguel Lillo 205, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), San Miguel de Tucumán T4000JFE. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo (CONICET-Fundación Miguel Lillo), Miguel Lillo 251, San Miguel de Tucumán T4000JFD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7131-0634
  • Juan Larraín Centro de Investigación en Recursos Naturales y Sustentabilidad (CIRENYS), Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-6561
  • Denilson Fernandes Peralta Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais, Av. Miguel Stéfano, 3687 - CEP 04301902 - São Paulo, SP https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-7258

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.3619744

Palavras-chave:

Andreaeaceae, bryophytes, nomenclature, taxonomy, typification

Resumo

The genus Andreaea Hedw. remains poorly understood in the Andean region of South America, where species delimitation has historically been based on highly variable morphological characters. In this study, the type material of Andreaea arachnoidea, A. lorentziana, A. fragilis, and A. semisquarrosa, all described by Müller from northwestern Argentina based on collections made by Lorentz during the nineteenth century, was critically revised. Examination of specimens preserved at JE demonstrated that these names do not represent distinct taxa, but correspond respectively to A. rupestris, A. mutabilis, or A. acutifolia. Morphological variation observed among the studied specimens mainly involves habit, branching pattern, leaf orientation, and leaf acumination, characters strongly influenced by environmental conditions in high-Andean habitats. The reinterpretation of A. arachnoidea further demonstrated that the arachnoid structures mentioned in the protologue correspond to fungal hyphae associated with the gametophores rather than to intrinsic morphological features of the moss. The synonyms proposed here contribute to the taxonomic clarification of Andreaea in South America and reinforce the floristic affinities between the Central Andes and austral-temperate bryophyte floras. We designate lectotypes for all the studied names.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Anderson, L. E. (1954). Hoyer’s solution as a rapid permanent mounting medium for bryophytes. The Bryologist 57: 242-244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3240091

Churchill, S. P., Sanjines, A. N. & Aldana, M. C. (2009). Catálogo de las briofitas de Bolivia: diversidad, distribución y ecología. Missouri Botanical Garden.

Churchill, S. P. & Linares C., E. L. (1995). Prodromus Bryologiae Novo-Granatensis: Introducción a la flora de musgos de Colombia. Biblioteca José Jerónimo Triana 12: 1-924.

Crosby, M. R., Magill, R. E., Allen, B. & He, S. (1999). A Checklist of the Mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.

Flores, J. R., Von Konrat, M., Larraín, J. & Suárez, G. M. (2017). Disjunct or continuous? On the distributional pattern of Cephaloziella hampeana (Nees) Schiffn. ex Loeske (Cephaloziellaceae, Marchantiophyta) in South America. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 38: 53-59. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb/v38.iss1.2017.53

Frey, W. & Stech, M. (2009) Marchantiophyta, Bryophyta, Anthocerotophyta. In Frey, W. (ed.), Syllabus of Plant Families, pp. 13-263. A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 13th ed., Part 3 Bryophytes and seedless Vascular Plants. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.

Herzog, T. (1916). Die Bryophyten meiner zweiten Reise durch Bolivia. Bibliotheca Botanica 87: 1-347.

Jimenez M. S., Schiavone, M. M., Suárez, G. M. & Delgadillo, C. (2015). Neosharpiella aztecorum H. Rob. & Delgad. (Gigaspermaceae), new to the bryophyte flora of South America. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 36: 69-74. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb.v36.iss1.2015.69

Matteri, C. M. (2003). Los musgos (Bryophyta) de Argentina. Tropical Bryology 24: 33-100. https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.24.1.8

Matteri, C. M. & Schiavone, M. M. (2002). Catálogo de los musgos (Bryophyta) de la Región Fueguina en Argentina y Chile. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 4: 111-138.

Murray, B. M. (1988). Systematics of the Andreaeopsida (Bryophyta): two orders with links to Takakia. Beiheft Nova Hedwigia 90: 289-336.

Murray, B. M. (1988b). The genus Andreaea in Britain and Ireland. Journal of Bryology 15: 17-82. https://doi.org/10.1179/jbr.1988.15.1.17

Murray, B. (2006). Andreaeaceae. In Flora of Australia Volume 51 (Mosses 1). ABRS and CSIRO Publishing, Canberra & Melbourne.

Müller, C. (1879). Prodromus bryologiae Argentinicae I. Linnaea 42: 217-460.

Müller, F. (2009). An updated checklist of the mosses of Chile. Archive for Bryology 58: 1-124.

Novara, L. J. (1983). Paul Lorentz, Max Siewert, Georg Hieronymus tres sabios en Salta. El Tribuno 6-8.

Peralta, D. F. (2020). The genus Andreaea Hedw. (Andreaeaceae, Bryophyta) in Brazil. Phytotaxa 451: 169-174. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.451.2.7

Schiavone, M. M. & Suárez, G. M. (2009). Globulinella halloyi (Pottiaceae), a new species from Argentina. The Bryologist 112: 584-588. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-112.3.584

Suárez, G. M. (2024). Taxonomical status of Andreaea clavata var. tenuior Broth. (Bryophyta, Andreaeaceae). Phytotaxa 642: 225-228. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.642.3.2

Suárez G. M. & Schiavone M. M. (2011). A taxonomic revision of the propaguliferous species of Pohlia (Bryaceae, Bryophyta) in Latin America. Lilloa 48: 217-249.

Suárez G. M. & Hentschel, J. (2024). Lectotypification of Andreaea vilocensis (Andreaeaceae, Bryophyta). Lindbergia 2024: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.025139

Suárez, G. M., Larraín, J. & Schiavone, M. M. (2013). Rediscovery and lectotypification of Dicranella lorentzii (Dicranellaceae, Bryophyta). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 48: 53-57. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v48.n1.52096

Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R., Gandhi, K.N., Gravendyck, J., Greuter, W., ...et al. (2025). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226839479.001.0001

Vitt, D. H. (1980). A comparative study of Andreaea acutifolia, A. mutabilis, and A. rupestris. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18: 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1980.10427254

Downloads

Publicado

2026-11-06

Como Citar

Suárez, G. M., Larraín, J., & Fernandes Peralta, D. (2026). Assessment of historical Andreaea names from northwestern Argentina clarifies the taxonomy of ecostate Andreaea species in the Central Andes. Bonplandia, 36(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.3619744

Edição

Seção

Artículos originales

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.