Principios del diseño curricular AICLE

Rebeca Mesas Jiménez

doi:10.30972/clt.237530

Autores/as

Rebeca Mesas Jiménez Universidad Rey Juan Carlos https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3957-426X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/clt.237530

Palabras clave:

enseñanza bilingüe, enfoque AICLE, planificación curricular, diseño de materiales, inclusión educativa, colaboración

Resumen

Desde la implantación del enfoque AICLE en el mundo de la enseñanza bilingüe, los docentes se vienen enfrentando a numerosos desafíos. La escasez de materiales que adopten un enfoque integrado de contenido y lengua y la falta de atención a la diversidad en el aula bilingüe a través del diseño curricular son dos de los retos que se analizan en este artículo. Como resultado, numerosos estudios han demostrado que el uso de materiales auténticos o adaptados no sólo favorece un aprendizaje más activo en contextos reales, sino que también posibilitan atender a las necesidades e intereses de los estudiantes, dando lugar a una enseñanza inclusiva. Además, la colaboración entre docentes AICLE se considera uno de los ingredientes principales para el éxito del enfoque.

Biografía del autor/a

Rebeca Mesas Jiménez, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Rebeca Mesas Jiménez es Licenciada en Traducción e Interpretación por la Universidad Pontificia Comillas y en Magisterio por el Centro Universitario de Educación. Cuenta con un Máster Universitario en Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) y otro Máster en las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la enseñanza y el tratamiento de las lenguas por la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). Enseña didáctica del inglés como lengua extranjera en la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC). Ha sido maestra de Primaria y ahora docente en Educación superior. Actualmente, entre sus líneas de investigación se encuentran la aplicación del enfoque AICLE, el uso de metodologías activas, la implantación del Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje con el fin de promover la inclusión educativa en el marco de la enseñanza bilingüe.

Citas

Anderson, Lorin y Krathwohl, David. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom's educational objectives. New York, Longman.

Anderson, Jason. (2023). Translanguaging in the ELT classroom. Modern English Teacher, (32)2, 46-50. https://bitly.ws/3ihz7

Ball, Phil. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Materials Design. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484036

Ball, Phil; Keith, Kelly y Clegg, John. (2015). Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Banegas, Darío Luis. (2018). Learning subject-specific content through ESP in a Geography-teaching programme: An action research story in Argentina. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.001

Banegas, Darío Luis. (2022). Research into practice: CLIL in South America. Language Teaching, 55(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000622

Banegas, Darío Luis y Hemmi, Chantal (eds.). (2021). CLIL: Present and future. En International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 281-295). Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9_14

Banegas, Darío Luis y Lauze, Cristina. (2020). CLIL and comprehensive sexual education: A case of innovation from Argentina. Profile, 22(2), 199-209. https://bitly.ws/3ihAu

Basse, Rachel y Pascual Peña, Iranzu. (2020). Does AfL promote discussion in CLIL classrooms? Exploring AfL techniques and their effect on classroom communication. En deBoer, Mark y Leontjev, Dmitri (eds.), Assessment and Learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms: Approaches and conceptualisations (pp. 189-204). Switzerland, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54128-6_8

Bauler, Clara y Kang, Emily (2020). Elementary ESOL and content teachers’ resilient co-teaching practices: A long-term analysis. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(4), 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2020.1747163

Bloom, Benjamin. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Michigan, Longman.

Chidananda, A. L. (2019). Understanding Disciplines and School Subjects. Karnataka, Mangalore University.

Coxhead, Averil. (2017). Academic vocabulary in teacher talk: Challenges and opportunities for pedagogy. Academic Language in a Nordic Setting, 9(3), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.5845

Cummins, Jim. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction. En Hornberger, Nancy (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Education (pp. 487-499). Boston, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36

Erasmus+. (2024). CLIL for All: Attention to Diversity in Bilingual Education. European Commission. https://bitly.ws/3ihPs

Escobar Urmeneta, Cristina. (2020). Coteaching in CLIL in Catalonia. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(2), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.54

Fazzi, Fabiana y Lasagabaster, David. (2020). Learning beyond the classroom: students’ attitudes towards the integration of CLIL and museum-based pedagogies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1714630

Ferrando, Ernesto. (2019). La enseñanza de segundas lenguas mediante contenidos históricos: un modelo teórico-práctico para el diseño de materiales con el enfoque AICLE. LACLIL, 11(2), 275-307. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.5

Francisco Déniz, Sergio David y Mallorquín, María Saray. (2021). Estudio sobre la metodología llevada a cabo en el aula AICLE en un centro educativo público de Tenerife. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 38, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2021.38.013

Frigols Martín, María Jesús; Marsh, David; Mehisto, Peeter y Wolff, Dieter. (2011). European Framework for CLIL teacher education. Strasbourg, Council of Europe Publishing. https://bitly.ws/3ihEv

Garzón-Díaz, Edgar. (2021). From cultural awareness to scientific citizenship: Implementing content and language integrated learning projects to connect environmental science and English in a state school in Colombia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(2), 242-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1456512

Giles, Amanda y Yazan, Bedrettin. (2020). ‘You’re not an island’: A middle grades language arts teacher’s changed perceptions in ESL and content teachers’ collaboration. RMLE Online, 43(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2020.1724045

González, Gladys Marta Elena; Díaz, Diana Raquel y León, Elba Consuelo. (2021). A CLIL Curriculum Design for Future Professionals of Hospitality and Tourism Management. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 15(1), e1513. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.3

Hahn, Stephanie. (2019). The problem with materials in CLIL: Needs and perspectives of Austrian CLIL history teachers. CELTMatters, 3, 17-24.

Hasenberger, Thomas. (2018). “The science of it …”: designing and teaching a CLIL curriculum. CELTMatters, 2, 11-18. https://bitly.ws/3ihF9

Hutchinson, Caroline. (2022). Images of the Past: Teaching CLIL History and Critical Thinking through Visual Texts. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (J-CLIL), 4, 60-73.

Ikeda, Makoto. (2019). The maximisation of learning in CLIL by transregister and translanguaging. Diversity in CLIL in Plurilingual Communities of Practice. SlideShare. https://bitly.ws/3ihFD

Ikeda, Makoto; Izumi, Shinichi; Watanabe, Yoshinori; Pinner, Richard y Davis, Matthew. (2021). Soft CLIL and English language teaching: Understanding Japanese Policy, Practice and Implications. Londres, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032332

Karabassova, Laura. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Evidence from a trilingual context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(3), 787-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1550048

Karabassova, Laura y Oralbayeva, Nurziya. (2023). CLIL Materials: From theory to practice. En Banegas, Darío Luis y Zappa-Hollman, Sandra (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp. 328-340). London, Rouledge.

Kavanagh, Barry. (2022). Online CLIL During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Can it be a Replacement for the Face-to-Face Classroom?. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (J-CLIL): JJCLIL, 4, 125-143.

Keogh, Conor. (2017). Using WhatsApp to Create a Space of Language and Content for Students of International Relations. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 10(1), 75-104. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.4

Lazarević, Nina. (2019). CLIL teachers’ reflections and attitudes: Surviving at the deep end. Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1703897

Lo, Yuen Yi. (2019). Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(7), 818-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821

Lopriore, Lucilla. (30 de mayo de 2014). CLIL: una lingua franca. La ricerca. https://bitly.ws/3ihIw

Mahan, Karin Rose. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

Marongiu, Maria Antonietta. (2019). Teaching Materials and CLIL Teaching. Linguæ &. Rivista di lingue e culture moderne, 18(2), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2019-002-maro

Mehisto, Peeter. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro: revista de investigación e innovación en la clase de idiomas, 21, 15-33.

Morton, Tom. (2020). Cognitive Discourse Functions: A Bridge between Content, Literacy and Language for Teaching and Assessment in CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.33

Nguyen, Minh Hue y Dang, Thi Kim. (2021). Exploring teachers’ relational agency in content–language teacher collaboration in secondary science education in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00413-9

Okuno, Yukiko. (2018). Nihongokyōshi no tame no CLIL (naiyō gengo tōgōgata gakushū) nyūmon [Introduction to CLIL for Japanese Language Teachers]. Japón, Bonjinsha.

Ornia Noriega, Andrea; Fernández Costales, Alberto y Herce Sánchez, Fernando. (2024). Una rúbrica para analizar libros de texto AICLE en Educación Primaria. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica De Las Lenguas Extranjeras, (41), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi41.27547

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa y Siepmann, Philipp. (2022). Catering to Diversity in CLIL. Designing Inclusive Learning Spaces with ADiBE Digital Materials. Anglistik, (33)1, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.33675/ANGL/2022/1/16

Pham, Phuong Anh y Unaldi, Aylin. (2022). Cross-curricular collaboration in a CLIL bilingual context: the perceptions and practices of language teachers and content subject teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(8), 2918-2932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1995320

Prats, Joaquim y Santacana, Joan. (2011). Didáctica de la Geografía y la Historia. Barcelona, Editorial Grao.

Roomy, Andrew. (2022). A Lesson on Athleisure: An exercise in CLIL curriculum design. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association (J-CLIL), 25-40.

Sánchez, María del Mar y Salaberri, María S. (2018). Planning CLIL units in primary education from a cognitive perspective. Revista de Estudios Ingleses Odisea, (19), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i19.1892

Savinykh, Anna. (2021). Framework for CLIL materials for Russian heritage. International Journal of Multilingual Education, (18), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2021.18001

Stein, Nikki. (2017). Language in schools. En Basic Education Rights Handbook (pp. 204-217). SECTION27, Johannesburg.

Turner, Marianne y Fielding, Ruth. (2020). CLIL Teacher training and teachers’ choices: exploring planned language use in the Australian context. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(3), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1792920

Villabona, Nerea y Cenoz, Jasone. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Language and Curriculum, 35(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703

Yokono, Narumi. (2021). Using project-based CLIL and social media to contribute to local tourism: Integrating content, language, and technology. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogical Association (JJCLIL), 31-49.