Valores y normas en Hans Kelsen y Max Ernst Mayer

Miguel Herszenbaun

doi:10.30972/nvt.0133123

Authors

Miguel Herszenbaun CONICET/UBA/CIF/GEK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/nvt.0133123

Keywords:

Norm, Legal, Culture, Value

Abstract

In the following paper, I compare Kelsen’s model, according to which positive Law is understood as a system of relative values, with Max Ernst Mayer’s model, in which legal norms must be based on and agree with pre-legal culture norms. I claim that Mayer’s proposition can be understood as a tool that goes beyond Kelsen’s dichotomic scheme, but at the same time, it proves to be insufficient for answering main questions raised by Mayer. Accordingly, I intent to prove that it is necessary to integrate a dialectic character to the dynamic by which the community produces multiple normative sources and to the dynamic by which different norms interact, on pain of not being able to explain the validity of legal and culture norms and the dynamics by which norms derogate each other

References

Eisler, Rudolf, Lexicon. Online: http://www.textlog.de/32403.html.

Hammer, Stefan, “A Neo-Kantian Theory of Legal Knowledge in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law?”, Paulson, Stanley, Litschewski Paulson, Bonnie, Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 177-194.

Hegel, G. W. F., Principios de la filosofía del derecho, Buenos Aires, Sudamericana, 2004.

Kant, Imannuel, Crítica de la razón pura, Colihue, Buenos Aires, 2007.

Kant, Immanuel, Metafísica de las costumbres, Altaya, Barcelona, 1996

Kelsen, Hans, Teoría pura del derecho, trad. R. Vernengo, UNAM, México, 1982

Kelsen, Hans, Teoría pura del derecho, Eudeba, Buenos Aires, 2015.

Kelsen, Hans, “La doctrina del derecho natural ante el tribunal de la ciencia”, Qué es Justicia, Ariel, Barcelona, 1982, pp. 64-112.

Luft, Sebastian, The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian. Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, and Cassirer), Oxford, Oxford Scholarship Online, 2015.

Marí, Enrique, “Racionalidad e imaginario social en el discurso del orden, Doxa, n 3, 1986, pp. 93-111

Mayer, Max Ernst, Normas jurídicas y normas de cultura, Hammurabi, Buenos Aires, 2000.

Paulson, Stanley, “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 12, No 3, 1992, pp. 311-332.

Paulson, Stanley, “La alternativa kantiana de Kelsen: Una crítica”, DOXA, n. 9, 1991, pp. 173-187.

Paulson, Stanley, “Faktum/Wert-Distinktion, Zwei-Welten-Lehre und immanenter Sinn. Hans Kelsen als Neukantianer“, Alexy, R., Meyer, L., Paulson, S., Sprenger, G., Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie, Nomos Verlagsgesselschaft, Baden-Baden, 2002, pp. 223-252.

Sprenger, Gerhard, “Die Wertlehre des Badener Neukantianismus und ihre Ausstrahlungen in die Rechtsphilosophie“, Alexy, R., Meyer, L., Paulson, S., Sprenger, G., Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie, Nomos Verlagsgesselschaft, Baden-Baden, 2002, pp. 157-178.

Schmill, Ulises, “Algunas influencias de Hermann Cohen en Hans Kelsen”, Isonomía, no. 21, México, oct. 2004, pp. 117-155.

Strauss, Leo, “Sobre la ley natural”, Persecución y el arte de escribir y otros ensayos de filosofía política, Edicions Alfons El Magnánim, Valencia, 1996, pp. 133-148.