La política deliberativa y el proceso de la civilización
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30972/rcd.327957Resumen
Este artículo es una traducción autorizada de la obra original: “Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process” publicada en Review of International Studies, volumen 31, número 2, páginas 327-348, por Cambridge University Press. DOI: 0.1017/S0260210505006507.
Descargas
Citas
Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and Childhood. Routledge.
Benhabib, S. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics.
Burke, P. (1993). The Art of Conversation. Cambridge, Polity Press,.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge.
Deitelhoff, N., & Müller, H. (2005). Theoretical paradise–empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 167-179. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006507
Elias, N. (1996). The Germans. Basil Blackwell.
Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Polity.
Habermas, J. (1998a). Paradigms of law. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges. University of California Press.
Habermas, J. (1998b). Reply to the symposium participants. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges. University of California Press.
Hopgood, S. (2000). Reading the small print in global civil society: The inexorable hegemony of the liberal self. Millennium, 29, p. 10.
Hutchings, K. (1997). Moral deliberation and political judgment: Reflections on Benhabib’s interactive universalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 14.
Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for Third World politics. Alternatives, 27, pp. 459—487.
Lichtenberg, J. (1981). National boundaries and moral boundaries: A cosmopolitan view. En P. G. Brown & H. Shue (Eds.), Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits (p. 94). Toyota: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lynch, M. (2000). The dialogue of civilisations and international public spheres. Millennium, 29, pp. 307 a 330.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
McCarthy, T. (1998). Legitimacy and diversity: Dialectical reflections on analytic distinctions. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges (pp. 134—135). Londres: University of California Press.
Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue! Communicative action in world politics. International Organisation, 54.
Rustin, C. (1999). Habermas, discourse ethics and international justice. Alternatives, 24, pp. 167—192.
Rosenfeld, M. (1998). ¿Can rights, democracy and justice be reconciled through discourse theory? Reflections on Habermas’s proceduralist paradigm of law. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on law and democracy: Critical exchanges (pp. [indicar las páginas del capítulo si es posible]). University of California Press.
Shapcott, R. (2001). Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Shapcott, R. (2002). Cosmopolitan conversations: Justice, dialogue and the cosmopolitan community. Global Society, 16, pp. 221—243.
Ten, C. L. (1980). Mill on Liberty. Clarendon Press.
Van Vree, W. (1999). Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. Leicester University Press.
Van Vree, W. (1999). Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. Leicester University Press.
Williams, N. M. (1986). The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for Its Recognition. Stanford University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
52.jpg){kind=logo}
