La política deliberativa y el proceso de la civilización

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/rcd.327957

Resumo

Este artículo es una traducción autorizada de la obra original: “Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process” publicada en Review of International Studies, volumen 31, número 2, páginas 327-348, por Cambridge University Press. DOI: 0.1017/S0260210505006507.

Referências

Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and Childhood. Routledge.

Benhabib, S. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics.

Burke, P. (1993). The Art of Conversation. Cambridge, Polity Press,.

Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge.

Deitelhoff, N., & Müller, H. (2005). Theoretical paradise–empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 167-179. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006364

Elias, N. (1996). The Germans. Basil Blackwell.

Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173308

Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application. Cambridge, Polity Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Polity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Habermas, J. (1998a). Paradigms of law. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917613-003

Habermas, J. (1998b). Reply to the symposium participants. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges. University of California Press.

Hopgood, S. (2000). Reading the small print in global civil society: The inexorable hegemony of the liberal self. Millennium, 29, p. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290010601

Hutchings, K. (1997). Moral deliberation and political judgment: Reflections on Benhabib’s interactive universalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014001008

Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for Third World politics. Alternatives, 27, pp. 459—487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700403

Lichtenberg, J. (1981). National boundaries and moral boundaries: A cosmopolitan view. En P. G. Brown & H. Shue (Eds.), Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits (p. 94). Toyota: Rowman & Littlefield.

Lynch, M. (2000). The dialogue of civilisations and international public spheres. Millennium, 29, pp. 307 a 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020601

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772278

McCarthy, T. (1998). Legitimacy and diversity: Dialectical reflections on analytic distinctions. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges (pp. 134—135). Londres: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917613-007

Risse, T. (2000). Let’s argue! Communicative action in world politics. International Organisation, 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551109

Rustin, C. (1999). Habermas, discourse ethics and international justice. Alternatives, 24, pp. 167—192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549902400202

Rosenfeld, M. (1998). ¿Can rights, democracy and justice be reconciled through discourse theory? Reflections on Habermas’s proceduralist paradigm of law. En M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Eds.), Habermas on law and democracy: Critical exchanges (pp. [indicar las páginas del capítulo si es posible]). University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917613-006

Shapcott, R. (2001). Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491672

Shapcott, R. (2002). Cosmopolitan conversations: Justice, dialogue and the cosmopolitan community. Global Society, 16, pp. 221—243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220148058

Ten, C. L. (1980). Mill on Liberty. Clarendon Press.

Van Vree, W. (1999). Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. Leicester University Press.

Van Vree, W. (1999). Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. Leicester University Press.

Williams, N. M. (1986). The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for Its Recognition. Stanford University Press.

Publicado

2024-12-10

Como Citar

Linklater, A. (2024). La política deliberativa y el proceso de la civilización. Revista Científica De La Facultad De Derecho Y Ciencias Sociales Y Políticas, 3(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30972/rcd.327957

Edição

Seção

Reseñas de libros y traducciones