EReasonable time of proceedings and the due diligence duty The right of correction of parents and civil liability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30972/rcd.126239Keywords:
time, access to justice, special diligenceAbstract
The present paper examines the conventional standard known as reasonable time, focusing on those cases whether the delicate situation of persons subject to trials demands a timely response from the judicial body. In order to consider and determine how to act in these situations, this publication analyzes precedent cases from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights and the National Supreme Court of Justice, characterized by a special and diligent response facing urgent cases.References
Agencia de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea y Consejo de Europa (2016). Manual sobre el Derecho europeo relativo al acceso a la justicia. Luxemburgo. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea.
Calvez, Françoise y Regis, Nicolas, (2018). Length of court proceedings in the member states of the Council of Europe based on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Estrasburgo. Editado por el Consejo de Europa.
Couture, E. (1954). Proyecto de Código de Procedimiento Civil de Buenos Aires.
Morello, Augusto M (1996). Anticipación de la Tutela. La Plata. Librería Editora Platense SRL.
Salmón E. & Blanco C. (2012). El derecho al debido proceso en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (Segunda ed.). Bogotá. Editorial Universidad del Rosario
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Research Journal of the Faculty of Law and Social and Political Sciences – UNNE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
