First radiotransmitters implantation experience in the viper Bothrops alternatus

Authors

  • D. G. Vera Universidad Nacional de La Plata. División Zoología Vertebrados. Sección Herpetología https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5923-8411
  • M. Clausse Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN) CONICET-CIC-UNCPBA. Centro de Medicina Veterinaria Traslacional (MEVET). Hospital Escuela de Pequeños Animales https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0113-6693
  • P. Nejamkin Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN) CONICET-CIC-UNCPBA. Centro de Medicina Veterinaria Traslacional (MEVET). Hospital Escuela de Pequeños Animales https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-3327
  • K. Almaraz Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil (CIVETAN) CONICET-CIC-UNCPBA. Centro de Medicina Veterinaria Traslacional (MEVET). Hospital Escuela de Pequeños Animales https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8566-6302
  • I. Berkunsky Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Instituto Multidisciplinario sobre Ecosistemas y Desarrollo Sustentable-CICPBA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-4241

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3517481

Keywords:

conservation biology, grasslands, monitoring, radiotelemetry, snakes

Abstract

Radio telemetry has become a valuable tool for studying the spatial and reproductive ecology of snakes. Various methodologies have been used to attach radio transmitters to snakes, including external placement with adhesive tape, forced ingestion, and skin glue application. Still, these methods have limitations and negative effects on snakes, such as transmitter loss or alterations in feeding behavior. This study presents the first case of radio transmitter implantation in the species Bothrops alternatus in
Argentina. Two large venomous snakes B. alternatus specimens, were captured from the wild. A procedure was followed based on previous work with specific adaptations for venomous snakes. The specimens were anesthetized with isoflurane and provided with oxygen throughout the surgery. A 2 cm incision was made in each specimen, the muscle was divided, and access to the celomic cavity was obtained. The previously sterilized radio transmitter was placed in this cavity, and its antenna was tunneled under the skin towards the upper body. Subsequently, the muscle layers and skin were sutured with sterile material. The surgery was successful in both specimens, lasting approximately 30 minutes, with rapid recovery post-anesthesia. The transmitters emitted signals detected at distances of up to 500 meters in the field, allowing tracking of the snakes’ movements over 10 days. However, it was observed that the transmitter battery life was shorter than expected, limiting long-term monitoring. This work represents a significant contribution to the field of snake radio telemetry in Argentina, providing a detailed and successful protocol for radio transmitter implantation in venomous snakes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alworth LC, Hernandez SM, Divers SJ. Laboratory reptile surgery: principles and techniques. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2011; 50(1): 11-26.

Attademo A, Bertona M, Kozykariski ML, Chiaraviglio de Torres M. Uso del hábitat por Boa constrictor occidentalis (Serpentes: Boidae) durante la estación seca en Córdoba, Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol. 2004; 18(1): 33-41.

Bryant GL, Eden P, De Tores P, Warren K. Improved procedure for implanting radiotransmitters in the coelomic cavity of snakes. Aust. Vet. J. 2010; 88(11): 443-448.

Chiaraviglio M. The effects of reproductive condition on thermoregulation in the Argentina boa constrictor (Boa constrictor occidentalis) (Boidae). Herpetol. Monogr. 2006; 20(1): 172-177.

Cross CL, Petersen CE. Modeling snake microhabitat from radiotelemetry studies using polytomous logistic regression. J. Herpetol. 2001; 590-597.

De la Quintana P, Rivas JA, Valdivia F, Pacheco LF. Home range and habitat use of Beni anacondas (Eunectes beniensis) in Bolivia. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2017; 38(4): 547-553.

de Roodt AR, Lanari LC, Laskowicz RD, Botassi S, Rocco DM, Costa de Oliveira V, Regner PI. Comparación de caracteres corporales y del veneno de Bothrops alternatus entre poblaciones de las provincias de Buenos Aires y Entre Ríos, Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol. 2012; 26(1): 05-12.

Fitch HS, Shirer HW. A radiotelemetric study of spatial relationships in some common snakes. Copeia. 1971; 1: 118-128.

Fraga RD, Magnusson WE, Abrahão CR, Sanaiotti T, Lima AP. Habitat selection by Bothrops atrox (serpentes: viperidae) in central Amazonia, Brazil. Copeia. 2013; (4): 684-690.

Giraudo AR, Arzamendia V, Bellini GP, Bessa CA, Calamante CC, Cardozo G, Chiaraviglio M, Costanzo MB, Etchepare EG, Di Cola V, Di Pietro DO, Kretzschmar S, Palomas S, Nenda SJ, Rivera PC, Rodriguez ME, Scrocchi GJ, Williams JD. Categorización del estado de conservación de las Serpientes de la República Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol. 2012; 26(1): 303-326.

Kroll JC, Clark Jr DR, Albert JW. Radiotelemetry for Studying Thermoregulation in Free‐Ranging Snakes. Ecology. 1973; 54(2): 454-456.

Lentini AM, Crawshaw GJ, Licht LE, McLelland DJ. Pathologic and hematologic responses to surgically implanted transmitters in eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus). J. Wildl. Dis. 2011; 47(1): 107-125.

Mader DR. Reptile medicine and surgery, 2nd ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2006; p. 381-382.

Martin-Bashore TE, Bashore TL. Field techniques for surgically implanting radio transmitters in venomous snakes. 2001. Disponible en: http://www.nmfwa.net/uploads/documents/Herp_Slideshow.pdf. Último acceso octubre 2021.

Plummer MV. Nesting movements, nesting behavior, and nest sites of green snakes (Opheodrys aestivus) revealed by radiotelemetry. Herpetologica. 1990; 190-195.

Reinert HK, Cundall D. An improved surgical implantation method for radio-tracking snakes. Copeia. 1982; (3): 702-705.

Riley JL, Baxter‐Gilbert JH, Litzgus JD. A comparison of three external transmitter attachment methods for snakes. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2017; 41(1): 132-139.

Shine R, Lambeck R. A radiotelemetric study of movements, thermoregulation and habitat utilization of Arafura filesnakes (Serpentes: Acrochordidae). Herpetologica. 1985; 351-361.

Slip DJ, Shine R. Habitat use, movements and activity patterns of free-ranging Diamond Pythons, Moreliaspilotaspilota (Serpentes, Boidae)-a radiotelemetric study. Wildl. Res. 1988; 15(5): 515-531.

Smaniotto NP, Moreira LF, Rivas JA, Strüssmann C. Home range size, movement, and habitat use of yellow anacondas (Eunectes notaeus). Salamandra. 2020; 56(2): 159-167.

Újvári B, Korsós Z. Use of radiotelemetry on snakes: A review. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2000; 46(2): 115-146.

Williams JD, Vera DG, Di Pietro DO. Lista comentada de las serpientes de la Argentina, con referencias a su sistemática, distribución geográfica, dieta, reproducción, potencial peligrosidad y etimologías. Rev. Mus. La Plata. 2021; 6(1): 26-124.

Williams JD, Vera DG. Serpientes de la Argentina. Ediciones LBN; 2023. p. 351.

Zdenek CN, Hay CJ, Michael DR. Recommendations for using the subdermal stitch method to attach external transmitters on snakes. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 2021; 16(2): 374-385.

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

Vera, D. G., Clausse, M., Nejamkin, P., Almaraz, K., & Berkunsky, I. (2024). First radiotransmitters implantation experience in the viper Bothrops alternatus. Revista Veterinaria, 35(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3517481

Issue

Section

Artículos