This is an outdated version published on 2025-07-01. Read the most recent version.

What does it mean to be defeated by pleasures? Hedonism and akrasia in Plato’s Protagoras

Authors

JUAN PABLO FIGUEROA CRIVELLI Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1227-1297

DOI:

Keywords:

pleasure, good, hedonism, virtue, Plato

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the final argument of Protagoras, where Socrates introduces the question of pleasure and its relation to the good. In order to do so, it is necessary to consider the initial arguments where the question of the teachability of virtue (aretê) and the subsequent attempt to reach a unifying criterion, one which will focus on its sapiential character. This itinerary will allow us to shed light on the Socratic arguments from 351b onwards and the introduction of hedonism, which will enable us to delimit Socrates' position in relation to the problem of akrasia. The knowledge of the virtues –understood as wisdom– will be a necessary condition for right action, and, consequently, whoever is overcome by pleasure in reality ignores what is really best.

Author Biography

JUAN PABLO FIGUEROA CRIVELLI, Universidad del Norte Santo Tomás de Aquino

Nació en Tucumán, Argentina. Es Licenciado en Filosofía por la Universidad del Norte SantoTomás de Aquino (UNSTA). Ha participado en numerosos cursos sobre filosofía antigua y medieval, áreas de su interés. Actual-mente se desempeña como bibliotecario en la misma universidad y como docente en la Cátedra de Formación Humanística I.

References

Barthes, Roland. (1967). The death of the author. Aspen, (5–6).

Barthes, Roland. (1988 [1967]). La muerte del autor. En El susurro del lenguaje: más allá de la palabra y la escritura (pp. 65–72). Ediciones Paidós.

Boden, Margaret A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2.ª ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203483677

Callon, Michel. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. En John Law (ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge.

Deuze, Mark. (2007). Media work. Polity Press.

Jenkins, Henry. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9780814742952/convergence-culture/

Latour, Bruno. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256047.001.0001

Lessig, Lawrence. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin Press. https://www.lessig.org/books/remix/

Manovich, Lev. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1064.001.0001

Noble, Safiya Umoja. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243/algorithms-of-oppression/

Ricoeur, Paul. (1983). Temps et récit. Tome I: L’intrigue et le récit historique. Éditions du Seuil.

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2025-07-01 — Updated on 2025-07-01

Versions

How to Cite

FIGUEROA CRIVELLI, J. P. (2025). What does it mean to be defeated by pleasures? Hedonism and akrasia in Plato’s Protagoras. New Itinerary, 21(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.30972/nvt.2118420

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Artículos

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Les autores ceden a Nuevo Itinerario los derechos de publicidad de sus trabajos, toda vez que hayan sido admitidos como parte de alguno de sus números. Ello no obstante, les autores retienen los derechos de propiedad intelectual y responsabilidad ética así como la posibilidad de dar difusión propia por los medios que consideren.