Irreversibility as an axiom: unidimensionality and succession in Kant's conception of time

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/nvt.2218919

Keywords:

Time, Form, Series, Dimensionality, Irreversibility

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that, according to Kantian doctrine, the irreversibility of time must be understood as an axiom directly derived from the form of sensitivity. I claim that the two Kantian axioms—the unidimensionality of time and the necessary succession of its moments—imply that time constitutes not only a series but a unidirectional series, in which each instant depends on the previous one. I demonstrate that this directionality does not come from empirical content, but is a structural feature of time as the pure form of intuition. Furthermore, I argue that this formal irreversibility must be distinguished from the irreversibility inherent in certain particular relations; specifically, those determined by causality in the Analogies of Experience. I conclude, therefore, that there are two senses of irreversibility in Kant: one grounded in the form of time itself and another associated with the objective order of phenomena in experience.

References

Allison, Henry Edward. (1992). El idealismo trascendental de Kant: Una interpretación y defensa. Anthropos Editorial.

Chenet, François-Xavier. (1994). L'assise de l'ontologie critique: L'esthétique transcendantale. Presses Universitaires de Lille.

Couturat, Louis. (1905). Les principes des mathématiques avec un appendice sur la philosophie des mathématiques de Kant. Félix Alcan, Éditeur.

De Bianchi, Silvia, & Wells, James Daniel. (2015). Explanation and the dimensionality of space: Kant's argument revisited. Synthese, 192(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0568-1

Falkenstein, Lorne. (1995). Kant's intuitionism. A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. University of Toronto Press Incorporated.

Giribet, Gastón. (2023). La contingencia de la dimensionalidad del espacio en la obra kantiana del período precrítico. Cogency, 15(1), 24-49. https://doi.org/10.32995/cogency.v15i1.394

Guyer, Paul. (1987). Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624766

Heimsoeth, Heinz. (1967). Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Zweiter Teil: Vierfache Vernunftantinomie; Natur und Freiheit; intelligibler und empirischer Charakter. Walter de Gruyter.

Herzenbaum, Miguel. (2018). La antinomia de la razón pura en Kant y Hegel. Ediciones Alamanda.

Jáuregui, Claudia. (2015). Kant y Hume: sobre los alcances de la demostración del principio de la segunda analogía de la experiencia. En C. Jáuregui, F. Moledo, H. Pringe & M. Thisted (Eds.), Crítica y metafísica: homenaje a Mario Caimi (pp. 185-199). Olms.

Kant, Immanuel. (2022). Crítica de la razón pura. Trad. M. Caimi. Colihue.

Kant, Immanuel. (1900 ss.). Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften; vol. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin; since vol.. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.

Kant, Immanuel. (2002). Lecciones de metafísica según Mrongovius. Siglo XXI.

Kemp Smith, Norman. (2003). A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Palgrave Macmillan.

Martínez, Luciana. (2022a). “Kant on mathematical axioms”, Estudos Kantianos, 10 (1), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.36311/2318-0501.2022.v10n1.p213

Martínez, Luciana. (2022b) Algunas apreciaciones acerca del concepto crítico de demostración. Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 55 (1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.5209/asem.76153

Nagel, Gordon. (1983). The Structure of Experience Kant's System of Principles. The University of Chicago Press.

Paton, Herbert James. (1961). Kant's metaphysic of experience (Vol. 1). George Allen & Unwin.

Reichenbach, Hans. (1958). The Philosophy of Space and Time. Dover.

Reyna, Rafael. (2024). Segunda analogía: Principio de la sucesión temporal según la ley de la causalidad. AAVV: Kant y la Tierra de la verdad. Comentario a la Analítica de los principios (pp.77-95). Tirant.

Torretti, Roberto. (1967). Manuel Kant. Charcas.

Vaihinger, Hans. (1892). Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Zweiter Band. Union Deutsche Verlasgesselschaft.

Watkins, Eric. (2005). Kant and the metaphysics of causality. Cambridge University Press.

Willaschek, M.; Stolzenberg, J.; Mohr, G.; y Bacin, S. (eds.). (2015). Kant-Lexikon (Vols. 1-3). Walter de Gruyter.

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

Pelegrin, L. (2026). Irreversibility as an axiom: unidimensionality and succession in Kant’s conception of time. New Itinerary, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30972/nvt.2218919

Issue

Section

Artículos