Willingness to pay for the welfare of stray companion animals in Greece

A. S. Siettou; E. Theodoropoulou; V. Karagianni; E. Sossidou

doi:10.30972/vet.3617986

Autores/as

A. S. Siettou Harokopio University of Athens https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3974-9169
E. Theodoropoulou Harokopio University of Athens https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4115-0924
V. Karagianni University of West Attica https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5552-8660
E. Sossidou Research Director of Elgo Demeter https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5716-0908

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3617986

Palabras clave:

Disposición a pagar, animales de compañía callejeros, bienestar animal, Grecia

Resumen

Este artículo es un estudio de valoración contingente que investigará la disposición a pagar por el bienestar animal de los perros y gatos callejeros en Grecia gestionados por los municipios. La pregunta para este estudio fue si las personas estarían dispuestas a pagar y cuánto apoyar a sus municipios en la gestión. Una encuesta en línea recogió respuestas de toda Grecia. Después de analizar los datos, se identificaron ciertas características sociodemográficas de los encuestados. La mayoría de los encuestados son urbanistas que están muy preocupados por el problema de los animales de compañía callejeros del país. Utilizando Stata 14, un modelo de valoración contingente mostró que el 63% de los participantes (250 personas) están dispuestos a contribuir económicamente. Los factores clave que influyen en esta disposición a apoyar económicamente incluyen la edad de los encuestados, el historial de donaciones y su consideración de adoptar un animal en el futuro. La cantidad media que los participantes están dispuestos a pagar es de 9,18 euros.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bekkers R, Wiepking P. A literature review of empirical studies on philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2011; 40(5): 924-973.

Bennett RM. People’s willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Anim Welfare. 1996; 5(1): 3-11.

Bousfield B, Brown R. Animal welfare. Vet Bull. 2010; 1(4): 1-12.

Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade N.F. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2003; 24(2): 1-48.

Clark B, Stewart GB, Panzone LA, Kyriazakis I, Frewer LJ. Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy. 2017; 68: 112-127.

Diavgeia. Transparency Program: Diavgeia. 2010. Available at: https://diavgeia.gov.gr/ [Accessed 17 Nov. 2024].

Eteron Institute. The Transparency Program and its Role in Public Administration and Politics in Greece. 2022. Available at: https://eteron.org/en/the-transparency-program/

Faunalytics. Giving to Animals: New Data on Who and How. Faunalytics. 2018. Retrieved from https://faunalytics.org/giving-to-animals-new-data-who-how

Faunalytics. The People Who Support Animal Causes: Descriptive Results. 2021. Available at: https://faunalytics.org/people-who-support-animal-causes-descriptive-results/

Filippas G, Stelios S, Theologou K. “Animal Rights in Greece: Legislation and Perceptions”. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, EJTAS, 2024; 2(3): 976-987.

Friedmann E, Son H. The human–companion animal bond: how humans benefit. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009; 39(2): 293-326.

Greece, European Union [Internet]. European Union. Available from: https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-countries/greece_en.

Greek Reporter. Greece Approves New Pet Law: “No Animal Abandoned or Abused”. GreekReporter.com. 2021. Available at: https://greekreporter.com/2021/09/16/greece-new-pet-law/ [Accessed 17 Nov. 2024].

Habibov N, Cheung A, Auchynnikava A. Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 189: 25-34.

Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT). Population and Housing Census: Resident Population Results. 2021. Retrieved from https://www.statistics.gr/en/2021-census-res-pop-results.

Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT). Use of Information and Communication Technologies by Households and Individuals. 2019. Available at: https://www.statistics.gr/en/infographic-ecommerce-2019 [Accessed 16 Nov. 2024].

Jones IM. How charities can engage younger generations [Internet]. Charity Digital; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 19]. Available from: https://charitydigital.org.uk/topics/topics/how-charities-can-engage-younger-generations-10297.

Kede. Petsas: Major program for the sterilization of stray companion animals. KEDE.gr. 2021. Available at: https://kede.gr/st-petsas-mega-programma-steiroseon-gia-ta-adespota-zoa-syntrofias/ [Accessed 17 Nov. 2024].

Kelfve S, Kivi M, Johansson B, Lindwall M. Going web or staying paper? The use of web-surveys among older people. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20: 1-12.

Lescun C. Cats and dogs: a community concern? Results of a survey on companion animals. Dept. of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. 1990; 72 p.

Lopez-Feldman A. Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata. 2012.

Loubière S, Taylor O, Tinland A, Vargas-Moniz M, O’shaughnessy B, Bokszczanin A, Hakan Kallmen, Roberto Bernad, Judith Wolf, Massimo Santinello, Anderson Loundou, Jose Ornelas, Pascal Auquier Europeans’ willingness to pay for ending homelessness: a contingent valuation study. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 247: 112802.

McClellan K. Becoming Animal People. Anthropological Quarterly, AQ. 2019; 92(3): 787-816.

McDowall S, Hazel SJ, Chittleborough C, Hamilton-Bruce A, Stuckey R, Howell TJ. The impact of the social determinants of human health on companion animal welfare. Animals. 2023; 13(6): 1113.

Mesch DJ, Brown MS, Moore ZI, Hayat AD. Gender differences in charitable giving. Int. J. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Mark. 2011; 16(4): 342-355.

Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future. 1989.

National Philanthropic Trust UK (NPT UK). UK Charitable Giving Statistics. 2021. Available at: https://www.nptuk.org/philanthropic-resources/uk-charitable-giving-statistics/ [Accessed 16 Nov. 2024].

Newsbeast. Greece is filled with stray dogs. Η Ελλαδα έχει γεμίσει με αδέσποτα σκυλιά [Internet]. Available from: https://www.newsbeast.gr/environment/arthro/9256928/giati-i-ellada-echei-gemisei-me-adespota-skylia-70-000-zoun-egkataleleimmena-sta-vouna-kai-3-ekat-se-oli-ti-chora.

Papavasili T, Kontogeorgos A, Mayrommati A, Chatzitheodoridis F, Sossidou E. Defining priority issues for managing stray dog populations: The case of Greece. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc. 2023; 74(1): 5305-5314.

Piper G, Schnepf SV. Gender Differences in Charitable Giving in Great Britain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2008; 19(2): 103-124.

RSPCA. Animal Kindness Index: Key Findings. 2022. Available at: https://www.rspca.org.uk/whatwedo/latest/kindnessindex2022/report [Accessed 16 Nov. 2024].

Sandoval-Cervantes I. Semi-Stray Dogs and Graduated Humanness: The Political Encounters of Dogs and Humans in Mexico. In: Pręgowski, M. (eds) Companion Animals in Everyday Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 2016.

Schulz-Sandhof S, Schupp J. Income and Charitable Giving: Insights from Germany. DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin 2022; 12(45): 1-10. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwdwr/dwr12-45-1.html [Accessed 16 Nov. 2024]

Serpell JA. How happy is your pet? The problem of subjectivity in the assessment of companion animal welfare. Anim Welfare. 2019; 28(1): 57-66.

Siettou C. The UK public’s perceptions on the issue of the dog overpopulation problem and people’s willingness to pay (WTP) for a humane stray dog management. 2015.

Siettou C, Fraser I, Fraser R. A choice experiment analysis of the management of the stray dog population in the UK. 2013.

Smith WG. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. Online submission. 2008.

Sneddon JN, Evers U, Lee JA. Giving to animal charities: A nine-country study. Anthrozoös. 2021; 34(6): 823-838.

Stathakis D, Baltas P. The Greek model of urbanization. Land Use Policy. 2024; 140: 107113.

Taylor N, Signal TD. Willingness to pay: Australian consumers and “on the farm” welfare. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci. 2009; 12(4): 345-59.

Thornton L, Batterham PJ, Fassnacht DB, Kay-Lambkin F, Calear AL, Hunter S. Recruiting for health, medical, or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review. Internet Interv. 2016; 4: 72-81.

Toronto Humane Society. Understanding the root causes of stray pets: a complex challenge [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.torontohumanesociety.com/understanding-the-root-causes-of-stray-pets-a-complex-challenge/.

Vander Naald B, Cameron TA. Willingness to pay for other species’ well-being. Ecol Econ. 2011; 70(7): 1325-35.

Vaughan WJ, Darling AH. The optimal sample size for contingent valuation surveys: applications to project analysis. 2000. 41 p.

Verga M, Michelazzi M. Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human–pet relationship. Ital J Anim Sci. 2009; 8(sup1): 231-40.

Zhao Y, Wu S. Willingness to pay: animal welfare and related influencing factors in China. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci. 2011; 14(2): 150-61.

Disposición a pagar por el bienestar de los animales de compañía callejeros en Grecia

Autores/as

DOI:

Palabras clave:

Resumen

Descargas

Citas

Descargas

Publicado

Cómo citar

Número

Sección

Licencia

Política de acceso abierto

Idioma

Indexaciones

Indexaciones

Enviar un artículo

Número actual