Immunogenicity of inactivated Salmonella sp vaccines used in the poultry industry in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3114636Keywords:
Poultry, Salmonella sp, inactivated vaccines, immunogenicity, quality controlAbstract
Salmonellosis is one of the most widespread infectious diseases worldwide, affecting humans and several animal species, and it has been historically linked to poultry production. Salmonella sp is a food-borne microorganism with impact on public health and also on the global trade of poultry products and by-products. Vaccination is one of the main tools to the pathogen and its effectiveness requires quality controls to measure their immunogenicity. The objective of this work was to determine the immunogenicity of three commercial avian Salmonella sp vaccines used in Argentinean poultry production by immunizing groups of birds and determining specific serum titers. Groups of birds were vaccinated according to a standardized procedure that comprises two vaccinations. Diversity was observed in the agglutination titers against Salmonella enteritidis among the vaccines analyzed, although all of them generated seroconversion in the birds. The vaccine 1 presented the biggest title averages, as much in the first one as in the second vaccination, being continued by the vaccine 3 and the vaccine 2. The final goal of the control of vaccines is to stimulate continuous improvement of their quality to produce safer food for the population.
Downloads
References
Andres VM, Davies RH. 2015. Biosecurity measures to control Salmonella and other infectious agents in pig farms. Compr Rev Food Sci & Food Saf 14: 317-335.
Barrow P. 1994. Serological diagnosis of Salmonella serotype enteritidis infections in poultry by ELISA and other tests. Int J Food Microbiol 21: 55-68.
Barrow P. 2007. Salmonella infections: immune and nonimmune protection with vaccines. Avian Pathol 36: 1-13.
Barrow P, Lovell M, Berchieri A. 1990. Immunization of laying hens against Salmonella enteritidis with live attenuated vaccines. Vet Rec 126: 241-242.
Caria D. 2017. Salmonelosis en granjas de pollos de engorde en la República Argentina. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, p. 16-28.
Desin T, KösterW, Potter A. 2013. Salmonella vaccines in poultry: past, present and future. Expert Rev Vaccines 12: 87-96.
Finn S et al. 2013. Mechanisms of survival, responses, and sources of Salmonella in low-moisture environments. Front Microbiol 4: 331.
Gantois I et al. 2006. Oral immunization of laying hens with the live vaccine strains of TAD Salmonella vac E and TAD Salmonella vac T reduces internal egg contamination with Salmonella enteritidis. Vaccine 24: 6250-6255.
Gast R, Beard C. 1990. Serological detection of experimental Salmonella enteritidis infections in laying hens. Avian Dis 34: 721-728.
Heredia N, García S. 2018. Animals as sources of foodborne pathogens: A review. Anim Nutr 4: 250-255. Hoelzer K et al. 2018. Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Vet Res 49: 64-70.
Humphrey T, Jorgensen, F. 2006. Pathogens on meat and infection in animals. Establishing a relationship using Campylobacter and Salmonella as example. Meat Science 74: 89-97.
Matulova M et al. 2013. SPI-1 defective mutants of Salmonella enterica induce cross-protective immunity in chickens against challenge with serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis. Vaccine 31: 3156–3162.
Nandre R, Dajeong L. 2015. Cross-protection against Salmonella typhimurium infection conferred by a live attenuated Salmonella enteritidis vaccine. Can J Vet Res 79: 16-21.
Nicholas R, Cullen G. 1991. Development and application of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis in chicken flocks. Vet Rec 128: 74-76.
OIE. 2018. Salmonelosis. Manual de pruebas de diagnóstico y de vacunas para animales terrestres (versión online), capítulo 2.9.8, pag. 1-18.
Paiva J et al. 2009. Efficacy of several Salmonella vaccination programs against experimental challenge with S.gallinarum in commercial brown layer and broiler breeder hens. Rev Bras Ciência Avíc 11: 65-72.
Pulido LM, Sánchez IR, Guard J, Pinheiro NV. 2013. Assignment of serotype to Salmonella enterica isolates obtained from poultry and their environment in southern Brazil. Lett Appl Microbiol 57: 288-294.
Revolledo L, Ferreira A. 2012. Current perspectives in avian salmonellosis: vaccines and immune mechanisms of protection. J Appl Poult Res 21: 418-431
Rios A et al. 2016. Alternatives to overcoming bacterial resistances: state-of-the-art. Microbiol Res 191: 51-80.
Vandeplas S et al. 2010. Salmonella in chicken: Current and developing strategies to reduce contamination at farm level. J Food Prot 73: 774-785.
Vossrech D et al. 2015. A temporal study of Salmonella enterica serotypes from broiler farms in Brazil. Poult Sci 94: 433-441.
Yang Y et al. 2017. Evaluation of recombinant Salmonella vaccines to provide cross-serovar and cross-serogroup protection. Poult Sci 96: 4352-4360.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Revista Veterinaria (Rev. Vet.) maintains a commitment to the policies of Open Access to scientific information, as it considers that both scientific publications as well as research investigations funded by public resources should circulate freely without restrictions. Revista Veterinaria (Rev. Vet.) ratifies the Open Access model in which scientific publications are made freely available at no cost online.
.jpg){kind=logo}
.jpg){kind=logo}
