Productive differentiation of dairy farms according to feeding strategies in the Central Santa Fe Basin, Argentina

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3719488

Keywords:

dairy production, animal feeding, discriminant analysis, farm scale, Pampas region.

Abstract

The intensification of dairy farming in the Pampas region has led to increasing diversification of feeding strategies. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate whether these strategies allow consistent discrimination of dairy farms in the Central Santa Fe Basin according to their daily milk production. Linear Discriminant Analysis was applied using data from 71 farms surveyed in the INTA Dairy Sector Survey. Farms were grouped into three production strata defined a priori: small (≤2,500 L day-1), medium (2,501–4,000 L day-1) and large (>4,000 L day-1). Two discriminant functions were obtained, of which the first explained 87% of the variance and was mainly associated with the intake of concentrate feed, maize grain, silage, and hay, as well as the contribution of grazing. Overall classification accuracy was 67.6%, decreasing to 54.9% under cross-validation. Performance by stratum, assessed using the F1-score, was higher for small and large farms (0.81 and 0.60, respectively) and lower for medium farms (0.48). Based on the discriminant structure, one representative farm per stratum was identified using Mahalanobis distance. It is concluded that feeding strategies allow moderate discrimination among dairy farms and enable the identification of feeding profiles that provide useful empirical references for subsequent applications, particularly in productive, economic, and environmental modelling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Alrawashdeh MJ, Radwan TR, Abunawas KA. Performance of linear discriminant analysis using different robust methods. Eur J Pure Appl Math. 2018; 11(1): 284-298. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v11i1.3176

2. Anrique R. Nutrición y alimentación de vacas lecheras en pastoreo. Publicación N.º 2, Plan Lechero Watt’s. Chile; 2012. Disponible en: https://consorciolechero.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/nutricion-y-alimentacion-de-vacas-lecheras-en-pastoreo.pdf

3. Apez ME, Engler PL, García Arancibia R. Caracterización de una tipología de tambos en la región pampeana de Argentina. FAVE Sección Ciencias Agrarias. 2025; 24: e0037. https://doi.org/10.14409/fa.2025.24.e0037

4. Bolsa de Comercio de Rosario. Radiografía del sector lácteo en Argentina. Rosario (AR): Bolsa de Comercio de Rosario; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.bcr.com.ar/es/mercados/investigacion-y-desarrollo/informativo-semanal/noticias-informativo-semanal/radiografia-7

5. Comerón E, Romero L, Vera M, Villar J, Maciel M, Charlón V, Tieri MP, Salado E. Algunas consideraciones sobre la evolución del proceso de intensificación de la lechería argentina y los aportes del INTA. Información Técnica de Producción Animal. INTA – Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; 2016. Disponible en: https://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/bitstream/handle/20.500.12123/8201/INTA_CRSantaFe_EEARafaela_Informacion_tecnica_produccion_animal_2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

6. Da Silva AR. biotools: Tools for biometry and applied statistics in agricultural science. Version 4.2 [software]. 2025. Disponible en: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=biotools

7. Engler PL, Cuatrin A. Brechas productivas y económicas de los tambos de la región Pampeana Argentina. 47º Congreso Argentino de Producción Animal: Ciencia y Tecnología para escenarios desafiantes. Asociación Argentina de Producción Animal (AAPA), Santa Fe, Argentina; 2024. Disponible en: https://www.aapa.org.ar/47capa/resumenes/06-ResSP2024.pdf

8. Engler PL, Cuatrin A, Apez ME, Maekawa M, Litwin GM, Centeno AR, Marino MR, Moretto ML. Encuesta Sectorial Lechera del INTA: Resultados y análisis del ejercicio productivo 2020–2021. Informe técnico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; 2022. Disponible en: https://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/vufind/Record/INTADig_a42dd07cd3273752fddce2f94b83c8bc

9. Engler PL, Cuatrin A, Apez ME, Maekawa M, Litwin GM, Centeno AR, Marino MR, Moretto ML, Almada G. Encuesta Sectorial Lechera del INTA: Resultados y análisis del ejercicio productivo 2022–2023. Informe técnico. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; 2024. Disponible en: https://caproler.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/30582552-encuesta-sectorial-lechera-inta-2022-23-documento-completo.pdf

10. Firke S. janitor: Simple tools for examining and cleaning dirty data. Version 2.2.1 [software]. 2024. Disponible en: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=janitor

11. Fox J, Weisberg S. An R companion to applied regression. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2019.

12. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7

13. Huberty CJ, Olejnik S. Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/047178947X

14. Lazzarini MB, Demarchi E, Lovino D, Baudracco J, Jáuregui JM. Evolución de la suplementación, el consumo de pastura y la producción de leche en sistemas lecheros de Argentina. FAVE Sección Ciencias Agrarias. 2015; 13(1-2): 73-78. https://doi.org/10.14409/fa.v13i1/2.4964

15. Modernel P, Dogliotti S, Álvarez S, Corbeels M, Picasso V, Tittonell P, Rossing WAH. Identification of beef production farms in the Pampas and Campos area that stand out in economic and environmental performance. Ecol Indic. 2018; 89: 755-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.038

16. O’Brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant. 2007; 41(5): 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

17. Pece MA, Álvarez HJ, Larripa MJ, Galil JR. Cambios en la productividad de los tambos del sur de Santa Fe = Changes in dairy farm productivity in the southern Santa Fe. Rev Argent Prod Anim. 2013; 33(2): 91-98. Disponible en: https://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/vufind/Record/INTADig_09781b87a543c84b7761e2e875e7c91f

18. Pérez J, Arrien MC, Cisneros Basualdo NE, Vuksinic E, Rodríguez CI. Huella hídrica de la leche y el queso: un caso de estudio en Tandil, Argentina. Revista Estudios Ambientales. 2021; 9(2): 28-48. https://doi.org/10.47069/estudios-ambientales.v9i2.1273

19. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.3.1 [software]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.R-project.org/

20. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2

21. Wei T, Simko V. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a correlation matrix. Version 0.95 [software]. 2024. Disponible en: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot

22. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. Version 1.1.4 [software]. 2023. Disponible en: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

23. Yahaya SSS, Lim YF, Ali H, Omar Z. Robust linear discriminant analysis. J Math Stat. 2016; 12(4): 312-316. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2016.312.316

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Villegas-Peña, A., Pagliettini, L., Mozeris, G., Domínguez, J., & Cipriotti, P. (2026). Productive differentiation of dairy farms according to feeding strategies in the Central Santa Fe Basin, Argentina. Revista Veterinaria, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3719488

Issue

Section

Artículos