Animal welfare in broiler chickens

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3628511

Keywords:

Poultry, hierarchical clustering, intensive production

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess broiler chickens welfare using transect and individual
assessment methodologies, evaluating the robustness of the latter as an effective tool for welfare evaluation
on poultry farms. Eight closed, tunnel-ventilated houses were studied, four fitted with blackout curtains and
four with translucent curtains. Along each transect, the number of immobile, lame, dirty, sick, dying, or dead
chickens was recorded. In the individual assessment, variables such as body weight, presence of footpad
lesions, tarsal burns, feather cleanliness, and gait were measured at each sampling point. Hierarchical
clustering analyses were performed using three aggregation methods: Complete, Average, and Ward.D,
allowing grouping of farms based on similarity in these variables. Farm-level analysis produced stable
clusters regardless of methodology. Dendrograms from the transect methodology were consistent across
all three clustering methods, while individual assessment also yielded stable clustering independent of the
clustering approach used. The findings suggest that both methodologies generate consistent and robust
patterns in the data, supporting their validity and applicability. Although minor differences between methods
were observed, their results were sufficiently congruent to recommend their combined use in future studies,
expanding analytical capabilities in diverse poultry welfare assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algers B, Berg C. Monitoring animal welfare on commercial broiler farms in Sweden. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A-Anim. Sci. 2001; 51(S30): 88-92.

Ayalew H, Zhang H, Wang J, Wu S, Qiu K, Qi G, Tekeste A, Wassie T, Chanie D. Potential Feed Additives as Antibiotic Alternatives in Broiler Production. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022; 9: 916473.

Ben Sassi N, Averós X, Estevez I. Technology and poultry welfare. Animals. 2016; 6(10): 62.

Buzdugan SN, Alarcon P, Huntington B, Rushton J, Blake DP, Guitian J. Enhancing the value of meat inspection records for broiler health and welfare surveillance: longitudinal detection of relational patterns. BMC Vet. Res. 2021; 17: 1-13.

Čobanović N, Magrin L. Editorial: Health and welfare problems of farm animals: prevalence, risk factors, consequences and possible prevention solutions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023; 10: 1238852.

De Jong IC, Hindle VA, Butterworth A, Engel B, Ferrari P, Gunnink H, Van Reenen CG. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare. Animal. 2016; 10(1): 117-127.

Hartcher KM, Lum HK. Genetic selection of broilers and welfare consequences: a review. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2020; 76(1): 154-167.

Informe cadena de valor. Avícola - carne y huevos. Año 10 - N°81 - febrero 2025. ISSN 2525-0221. Ministerio de economía. Dirección nacional de estudios regionales y cadenas de valor. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/cadena_aviar_2024.pdf

Knowles TG, Kestin SC, Haslam SM, Brown SN, Green LE, Butterworth A, Pope SJ, Pfeiffer D, Nicol CJ. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PloS One 2008; 3(2): e1545.

Kuivanen KS, Michalscheck M, Descheemaeker K, Adjei-Nsiah S, Mellon-Bedi S, Groot JC, Alvarez S. A comparison of statistical and participatory clustering of smallholder farming systems–A case study in Northern Ghana. J. Rural Stud. 2016; 45: 184-198.

Main DCJ, Whay HR, Leeb C, Webster AJF. Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes. Animal Welfare. 2007; 16(2): 233-236.

Marchewka J, Watanabe TTN, Ferrante V, Estevez I. Welfare assessment in broiler farms: Transect walks versus individual scoring. Poult. Sci. 2013; 92(10): 2588-2599.

Marchewka J, Estevez I, Vezzoli G, Ferrante V, Makagon MM. The transect method: a novel approach to on-farm welfare assessment of commercial turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2015; 94(1): 7-16.

Nicol CJ, Caplen G, Edgar J, Richards G, Browne WJ. Relationships between multiple welfare indicators measured in individual chickens across different time periods and environments. Animal Welfare. 2011; 20(2): 133-143.

Petracci M, Mudalal S, Soglia F, Cavani C. Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. World’s Poul Sci J. 2015; 71: 363-374.

Vieira Rios HV, Waquil PD, de Carvalho PS, Norton T. How are information technologies addressing broiler welfare? A systematic review based on the welfare quality® assessment. Sustainability. 2020; 12(4): 1413.

Stamp Dawkins M, Donnelly CA, Jones TA. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature. 2004; 427(6972): 342-344.

Ribeiro BPVB, Junior TY, de Oliveira DD, de Lima RR, Zangeronimo MG. Thermoneutral zone for laying hens based on environmental conditions, enthalpy and thermal comfort indexes. J. Therm. Biol. 2020; 93: 102678.

Vasdal G, Marchewka J, Newberry RC, Estevez I, Kittelsen K. Developing a novel welfare assessment tool for loose-housed laying hens–the Aviary Transect method. Poult. Sci. 2022; 101(1): 101533.

Vissers LS, Van Wagenberg CP, Baltussen WH. A method for calculating the external costs of farm animal welfare based on the Welfare Quality® Protocol. Front. anim. sci. 2023; 4: 1195221.

Welfare Quality. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. 2009.

Wilcox CH, Sandilands V, Mayasari N, Asmara IY, Anang A. A literature review of broiler chicken welfare, husbandry, and assessment. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2024. 80(1): 3-32.

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Menichelli, M., Gallard, E., Taié, A., Revidatti, F., Sindik, M., Spontón, S., Ojeda, A., & Fernández, R. (2025). Animal welfare in broiler chickens. Revista Veterinaria, 36(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.30972/vet.3628511

Issue

Section

Artículos

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>